Skip to content

Add ExportedExecutions type for export - #874

Merged
david049 merged 4 commits into
mainfrom
dliu/addexportedexecutions
Oct 5, 2026
Merged

david049 merged 4 commits into
mainfrom
dliu/addexportedexecutions

Conversation

@david049

@david049 david049 commented Oct 1, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

What changed?
Add an exported executions type for export which is wire compatible with previous WorkflowExecutions but also includes newer executions we want to export

Why?

Breaking changes

Server PR

@david049
david049 requested review from a team October 1, 2026 23:27
@CLAassistant

CLAassistant commented Oct 1, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown

CLA assistant check
All committers have signed the CLA.

Comment thread temporal/api/export/v1/message.proto Outdated
Comment on lines +32 to +33
repeated WorkflowExecution workflow_items = 1;
repeated ActivityExecution activity_items = 2;

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

nit: items is redundant

Suggested change
repeated WorkflowExecution workflow_items = 1;
repeated ActivityExecution activity_items = 2;
repeated WorkflowExecution workflows = 1;
repeated ActivityExecution activities = 2;

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

updated, thank you!

@david049
david049 merged commit 05384b5 into main Oct 5, 2026
4 checks passed
@david049
david049 deleted the dliu/addexportedexecutions branch October 5, 2026 14:42
VegetarianOrc pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 12, 2026
<!-- Describe what has changed in this PR -->
**What changed?**
Add an exported executions type for export which is wire compatible with
previous WorkflowExecutions but also includes newer executions we want
to export

<!-- Tell your future self why have you made these changes -->
**Why?**


<!-- Are there any breaking changes on binary or code level? -->
**Breaking changes**


<!-- If this breaks the Server, please provide the Server PR to merge
right after this PR was merged. -->
**Server PR**
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants