test: migrate stats/base/snanstdevyc to ULP-based assertions

[kgryte]

Resolves a part of #11352.

Description

What is the purpose of this pull request?

This pull request:

• migrates the tests for stats/base/snanstdevyc from relative tolerance testing to ULP difference testing.

Specifically, in test/test.snanstdevyc.js, test/test.ndarray.js, test/test.snanstdevyc.native.js, and test/test.ndarray.native.js:

• adds a @stdlib/number/float32/base/assert/is-almost-same-value require (the single-precision variant, as the package returns single-precision results), and removes the now unused @stdlib/math/base/special/abs and @stdlib/constants/float32/eps requires.
• removes the delta and tol computations, replacing t.strictEqual( delta <= tol, true, ... ) with t.strictEqual( isAlmostSameValuef( v, expected, 1 ), true, 'returns expected value' ).

This mirrors the already migrated sibling packages stats/base/snanstdevpn and stats/base/snanstdevwd, which use the same idiom and the same ULP bound. Only test files are changed; no implementation, documentation, or package.json changes were necessary. Exact comparisons (e.g., against 0.0, NaN, and in test/test.js) were left as-is.

Final ULP constant: 1 (used in all four test files, for both the JavaScript and the native assertions).

This is the measured minimum. The ULP difference between the returned value and the expected value was measured directly for each of the migrated assertions and is exactly 1 in every case. Tightening further fails: at an ULP bound of 0, 2 assertions fail in each of the four files; at 1, all pass.

Verification (locally, with the native add-on built so that the *.native.js suites actually run rather than skip):

• make test TESTS_FILTER=".*/stats/base/snanstdevyc/.*" → 149 assertions, 149 passing, 0 failing.
• The full suite was run twice at the final ULP bound of 1 with identical results, to confirm there is no FMA/architecture-dependent flakiness.
• ESLint (using etc/eslint/.eslintrc.tests.js) is clean on all four changed files, as is the filename lint.

Related Issues

Does this pull request have any related issues?

This pull request has the following related issues:

• [RFC]: Migrate math/base/special packages from relative tolerance testing to ULP difference testing (tracking issue) #11352

Questions

Any questions for reviewers of this pull request?

No.

Other

Any other information relevant to this pull request? This may include screenshots, references, and/or implementation notes.

The lint_editorconfig pre-commit check could not be run in this environment, as it attempts to download the editorconfig-checker binary from GitHub and outbound access to that repository was unavailable. The changed files were instead verified manually against .editorconfig (LF line endings, UTF-8, tab indentation, no trailing whitespace, final newline present).

Checklist

Please ensure the following tasks are completed before submitting this pull request.

• Read, understood, and followed the contributing guidelines.

AI Assistance

When authoring the changes proposed in this PR, did you use any kind of AI assistance?

• Yes
• No

If you answered "yes" above, how did you use AI assistance?

• Code generation (e.g., when writing an implementation or fixing a bug)
• Test/benchmark generation
• Documentation (including examples)
• Research and understanding

Disclosure

If you answered "yes" to using AI assistance, please provide a short disclosure indicating how you used AI assistance. This helps reviewers determine how much scrutiny to apply when reviewing your contribution. Example disclosures: "This PR was written primarily by Claude Code." or "I consulted ChatGPT to understand the codebase, but the proposed changes were fully authored manually by myself.".

This PR was authored by Claude Code, running as an unattended scheduled task. The agent selected the package, mirrored the migration idiom from the already migrated sibling packages, measured the minimum ULP bound empirically, and verified the tests and lint locally.

---

@stdlib-js/reviewers

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

https://claude.ai/code/session_01KEjj6wCAAtneuEjf7cRxy9

---

Generated by Claude Code

[stdlib-bot]

Hello! 👋

We've noticed that you've been opening a number of PRs addressing good first issues. Thank you for your interest and enthusiasm!

Now that you've made a few contributions, we suggest no longer working on good first issues. Instead, we encourage you to prioritize cleaning up any PRs which have yet to be merged and then proceed to work on more involved tasks.

Not only does this ensure that other new contributors can work on things and get ramped up on all things stdlib, it also ensures that you can spend your time on more challenging problems. 🚀

For ideas for future PRs, feel free to search the codebase for TODOs and FIXMEs and be sure to check out other open issues on the issue tracker. Cheers!

[stdlib-bot]

Coverage Report

Package	Statements	Branches	Functions	Lines
stats/base/snanstdevyc	$\\color{green}365/365$ $\\color{green}+100.00\\%$	$\\color{green}14/14$ $\\color{green}+100.00\\%$	$\\color{green}4/4$ $\\color{green}+100.00\\%$	$\\color{green}365/365$ $\\color{green}+100.00\\%$

The above coverage report was generated for the changes in this PR.