build: increase update equation step timeout

[officiallyanee]

---

type: pre_commit_static_analysis_report
description: Results of running static analysis checks when committing changes. report:

• task: lint_filenames status: passed
• task: lint_editorconfig status: passed
• task: lint_markdown_pkg_readmes status: na
• task: lint_markdown_docs status: na
• task: lint_markdown status: na
• task: lint_package_json status: na
• task: lint_repl_help status: na
• task: lint_javascript_src status: na
• task: lint_javascript_cli status: na
• task: lint_javascript_examples status: na
• task: lint_javascript_tests status: na
• task: lint_javascript_benchmarks status: na
• task: lint_python status: na
• task: lint_r status: na
• task: lint_c_src status: na
• task: lint_c_examples status: na
• task: lint_c_benchmarks status: na
• task: lint_c_tests_fixtures status: na
• task: lint_shell status: na
• task: lint_typescript_declarations status: passed
• task: lint_typescript_tests status: na
• task: lint_license_headers status: passed ---

Resolves none.

Description

What is the purpose of this pull request?

This pull request:

• increases update equation step timeout to 20 minutes from 15 minutes following of the failing workflow due to timeout: https://github.com/stdlib-js/stdlib/actions/runs/29713582835/job/88261872208
  It ran two make commands over 124 files and failed while processing the 120th file in second make command run.
  So doing some math ( which may be a little off since i didn't take into account one make command can take more time on average than the other ) 124x2=248 processing out of which it failed at 244th, so (15x60/244) = ~3.7s processing per file (twice). It needed approximately 15 secs more but as a safeguard bumping it up by 5mins.

Related Issues

Does this pull request have any related issues?

This pull request has the following related issues:

• none

Questions

Any questions for reviewers of this pull request?

No.

Other

Any other information relevant to this pull request? This may include screenshots, references, and/or implementation notes.

No.

Checklist

Please ensure the following tasks are completed before submitting this pull request.

• Read, understood, and followed the contributing guidelines.

AI Assistance

When authoring the changes proposed in this PR, did you use any kind of AI assistance?

• Yes
• No

If you answered "yes" above, how did you use AI assistance?

• Code generation (e.g., when writing an implementation or fixing a bug)
• Test/benchmark generation
• Documentation (including examples)
• Research and understanding

Disclosure

If you answered "yes" to using AI assistance, please provide a short disclosure indicating how you used AI assistance. This helps reviewers determine how much scrutiny to apply when reviewing your contribution. Example disclosures: "This PR was written primarily by Claude Code." or "I consulted ChatGPT to understand the codebase, but the proposed changes were fully authored manually by myself.".

{{TODO: add disclosure if applicable}}

---

@stdlib-js/reviewers

[kgryte]

Thanks for monitoring, @officiallyanee!

[kgryte]

Just kicked off a manual run of the workflow. Fingers crossed. 🤞

[officiallyanee]

#13579 it worked! 🎉

[kgryte]

Great! Let's hope I don't mess up the merge this time. 😅