[Keanro]

Summary

Adds WebClient.admin_conversations_bulkSetProperties (and the generated async and legacy versions) for admin.conversations.bulkSetProperties.

client.admin_conversations_bulkSetProperties(
    channel_ids=["C123", "C234"],
    property={"restrict_guests": True},
)

• channel_ids accepts a list or a comma-separated string, like admin_conversations_bulkArchive.
• property accepts a dict or a JSON string, like admin_conversations_setConversationPrefs. A dict is JSON-encoded.
• The arguments are sent form-encoded (params=). The API reference lists application/json as accepted, but when I sent a JSON body the API returned invalid_arguments with missing required field: channel_ids and missing required field: property.
• While this test uses restrict_guests and the documentation uses exclude_from_slack_ai, Slack Support has stated that there is internal documentation proving it works. Slack Support ticket 7040646. The test below also proves it works.

Testing

• Added the method to test_web_client_coverage.py, both to the all_api_methods list and as a call with sample arguments. ./scripts/run_validation.sh passes.

• Installed this branch locally and called the method against a real Enterprise Grid org with an org-level user token (admin.conversations:write):

  client.admin_conversations_bulkSetProperties(
      channel_ids=["C..."],
      property={"restrict_guests": True},
  )
  # {'ok': True, 'bulk_action_id': 'Bu...', 'not_updated': []}

Category

• slack_sdk.web.WebClient (sync/async) (Web API client)
• slack_sdk.webhook.WebhookClient (sync/async) (Incoming Webhook, response_url sender)
• slack_sdk.socket_mode (Socket Mode client)
• slack_sdk.signature (Request Signature Verifier)
• slack_sdk.oauth (OAuth Flow Utilities)
• slack_sdk.models (UI component builders)
• slack_sdk.scim (SCIM API client)
• slack_sdk.audit_logs (Audit Logs API client)
• slack_sdk.rtm_v2 (RTM client)
• /docs (Documents)
• /tutorial (PythOnBoardingBot tutorial)
• tests/integration_tests (Automated tests for this library)

Requirements

• I've read and understood the Contributing Guidelines and have done my best effort to follow them.
• I've read and agree to the Code of Conduct.
• I've run python3 -m venv .venv && source .venv/bin/activate && ./scripts/run_validation.sh after making the changes.

[hello-ashleyintech]

hi @Keanro! great work on the PR, it makes sense to me. would you be able to make an issue to link to this PR?

[hello-ashleyintech]

hi @Keanro, I'm seeing some lint failures in the CI. could you update the code addressing these?

[codecov]

Codecov Report

❌ Patch coverage is 83.33333% with 3 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.
✅ Project coverage is 84.32%. Comparing base (ab4e498) to head (94cb8ac).
✅ All tests successful. No failed tests found.

Files with missing lines	Patch %	Lines
slack_sdk/web/async_client.py	83.33%	1 Missing ⚠️
slack_sdk/web/client.py	83.33%	1 Missing ⚠️
slack_sdk/web/legacy_client.py	83.33%	1 Missing ⚠️

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #1991      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   84.35%   84.32%   -0.04%     
==========================================
  Files         118      118              
  Lines       13793    13811      +18     
==========================================
+ Hits        11635    11646      +11     
- Misses       2158     2165       +7     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Harness.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[Keanro]

Hey @hello-ashleyintech! Thank you! I've just pushed the lint changes + created #1992

[WilliamBergamin]

praise: Thanks for testing this against a real Enterprise org and confirming the form-encoded vs JSON body behavior. That's useful context for this method.