Add token-satrush.com to blocklist

[dref45ftg5555]

Reporting token-satrush.com for the Phantom blocklist.

Reason: fake $RUSH token portal with drainer link into it

Submitted automatically via Telegram bot on behalf of €.

Summary by CodeRabbit

• New Entries
  • Added token-satrush.com to the blocklist.
  • Identified the site as a fraudulent $RUSH token portal containing a wallet-draining link.

[coderabbitai]

No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉

ℹ️ Recent review info

⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Organization UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Advanced

Run ID: 63c095f8-8785-44a7-851f-8fae8017ddc2

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 5030186 and fc92926.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)

• blocklist.yaml

Limit details: You’ve used the included review currently available.

---

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

The blocklist now includes token-satrush.com and identifies it as a fake $RUSH token portal with a drainer link.

Changes

Blocklist update

Layer / File(s)	Summary
Add fraudulent token portal entry blocklist.yaml	Adds token-satrush.com with a description of its fake $RUSH token portal and drainer link.

Priority: ➖ Normal

Change: Feature

Merge Risk: ⚪ Minimal · up to fc929

The new fraudulent-domain entry is consumed by the existing blocklist pipeline and presents no identified merge-blocking risk.

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 5

✅ Passed checks (5 passed)

Check name	Status	Explanation
Description Check	✅ Passed	Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Title check	✅ Passed	The title clearly and concisely describes the main change: adding token-satrush.com to the blocklist.
Docstring Coverage	✅ Passed	No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check. Docstring coverage is scoped to functions touched by this diff. Analyzed 0 functions across 0…
Linked Issues check	✅ Passed	Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Out of Scope Changes check	✅ Passed	Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.

✨ Finishing Touches

🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)

• Create PR with unit tests

Usage-based review receipt

• Mode: Continue automatically
• Reviewed files: 1
• Charged: $0.25
• View usage details

Note

This review was completed with usage-based billing: files reviewed beyond your plan's included limits are billed at $0.25/file. View usage-based billing.

---

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.}