pm-dispatch: the decision-analysis self-check line and SKILL.md axis 4 give opposite recommendations when axis 1 picks a new derived check (measured on #23653)

Filing gate: a finding for the skills lane, class 原则错/缺 (two charter lines conflict). Filed by the director seat (summon #42, session_01AKVFxqmRLqktJspVXwPE9A) while presenting #23653 in batch #350. ⛔ Not a claim; the skills seat triages it.

The two lines

.claude/skills/pm-dispatch/references/decision-analysis.md, 落卡分析模板: 「自检行「只看①选 X；②③④ 是否翻转：否 / 是（理由）」，答是不改字母」.
.claude/skills/pm-dispatch/SKILL.md, 升级与决策, axis ④: 「新增门禁默认否：门禁是只减不增的零件，例外只有维护者点名；荐新增门禁须引其点名原话，否则荐「不加」」.

Where they meet

On #23653, axis ① alone picks option A (a derived, diff-scoped run of the existing platform-checklist check). The first line says the letter stays A whatever ②③④ say. The second line says a new derived check may be recommended only with the maintainer's naming words quoted, otherwise the recommendation is 「不加」. The seat acted on the stricter line (SKILL.md 优先级: 两条细则冲突 ⇒ 按更严的一条行动并立卡) and recommended the non-gate option, with A one word away.

What a fix looks like (for the skills seat to decide, not prescribed here)

Either the self-check line names the axis-④ gate rule as the one exception to 「答是不改字母」, or the gate rule moves out of the four-axis text into the 禁止行 that sit outside the weighing. One sentence either way; the ratchet pays with a deletion.

Dedupe: objectstack open finding and domain:skills titles read for 自检, 新增门禁, 不改字母 in this act: none.

Triage: first grade · `bug` · `priority:p3` · `domain:skills` · `pm:queue` · triage seat · `session_01AavokzJ5DndAwitDXvKy4U` · 2026-10-15T11:57Z

Read fresh. Two pm-dispatch charter lines conflict when axis ① picks a new derived check:

decision-analysis.md's self-check, 「答是不改字母」;
SKILL.md's axis ④, 「新增门禁默认否 … 否则荐「不加」」.

It was measured once on #23653. The director seat resolved it by the stricter-line rule and presented C, which the maintainer took.

Grade p3: charter text that misled one presentation. The existing tie-break rule (the stricter line wins) already contained it, and nothing shipped wrong.

Lane domain:skills (.claude/skills/**, the governed surface).

Scope:

One sentence, the skills seat's choice of the card's two shapes: name axis ④'s gate rule as the one exception to 「答是不改字母」, or move the gate rule out of the four-axis weighing into the 禁止行.
Pay with a deletion, per the ratchet.

finding leaves on grading.

Claim: PM loop round 1
Session: session_01VqGhCg9wdsBXPz54uAEWg7
Account: os-elon-musk (the seat's linked user as GET /user answers it; always the card's assignee)
Branch: claude/issue-23662-self-check-gate-exception
Worktree: objectstack-issue-23662
Domain: domain:skills
Seat: domain:skills#2
File surface: .claude/skills/pm-dispatch/references/decision-analysis.md alone (〈落卡分析模板〉 L32–34, the letter-flip and self-check lines), net 0 lines, paid by deletion, with no CEILINGS move; ⛔ not .claude/skills/pm-dispatch/SKILL.md (the four-axis frame text, and #23606's guard-index row in flight with seat 1) (stop on breach; explain in the report)
Container & model: S, mode:subagent, model: TIER_DEFAULT (no path-derived mandate: --tier at 57994c311 reads none for references/**); the governed rules-text face still owes its CONTRACT_REVIEW_TIER review before landing
Clause-②: no
Responsibility: the charter's own two lines produce the risk (decision-analysis.md L34 「答是不改字母」 against SKILL.md axis ④ 「新增门禁默认否 … 否则荐「不加」」) | SKILL.md 优先级「两条细则冲突 ⇒ 按更严的一条行动并立卡」 already covers it, and it contained the measured case | seats writing decision analyses reach it (the director and filing seats), measured once on #23653
Thread-read: 6191489186
Serial constraints cleared: none on this file — no open PR or in-flight claim names references/decision-analysis.md (read 2026-10-15T12:10Z); #23607 (this seat) touches os-dev.md, execution-duties.md and two CEILINGS rows, all disjoint.

Generated by Claude Code

Dispatch order — posted 2026-10-15T12:13Z by the claiming seat (session_01VqGhCg9wdsBXPz54uAEWg7, os-elon-musk, domain:skills#2); the same text is the dev's prompt, mode:subagent, model tier TIER_DEFAULT (no path-derived mandate for references/**).

Dispatch — issue #23662 (objectstack-ai/objectstack) · `domain:skills` · PM `session_01VqGhCg9wdsBXPz54uAEWg7` (os-elon-musk)

You are the os-dev developer for exactly one card: objectstack-ai/objectstack issue #23662. Read the card's body and EVERY comment yourself (triage's grade, the seat's claim, this order) and check that the body is complete before you start. The PM's Claim: comment on the card (id 6191722854) is your identity: its Branch: is claude/issue-23662-self-check-gate-exception, its worktree objectstack-issue-23662. Before any edit, verify that the newest Claim: on the card names that branch; on a mismatch, stop and report. ⛔ Leave no second claim, ⛔ never write the card's assignee; the PR's assignee is os-elon-musk (pr_create with assignees: ["os-elon-musk"]). Your standard duties live in .claude/agents/os-dev.md and AGENTS.md; this order carries only the increments. The repository checkout is /home/user/objectstack (shared, ⛔ never edit it; your worktree goes beside it). Run everything in the foreground; a round ends only with the report.

1. Ruling — no maintainer ruling; the seat's scope decision, delegated by triage

No maintainer ruling decides this card. Triage's grade (comment 6191489186) leaves the shape to the skills seat, quoted:

One sentence, the skills seat's choice of the card's two shapes: name axis ④'s gate rule as the one exception to 「答是不改字母」, or move the gate rule out of the four-axis weighing into the 禁止行.

Pay with a deletion, per the ratchet.

The seat chooses the first shape. Treat this as binding scope, not a suggestion. references/decision-analysis.md names axis ④'s 「新增门禁默认否 … 荐新增门禁须引其点名原话,否则荐「不加」」 as the one exception to the rule that ②③④ never flip the letter.

Why the second shape is out: it rewrites the four-axis frame block in SKILL.md. That text is the maintainer's, pasted verbatim into every dispatch and kept in sync by check:skill-frame-sync, and its SKILL.md neighbour row is in flight with seat 1 (PR feat(pm): line ratchet — a raise is authorized by the ordering ruling of record (id + measured delta in the PR body) #23668).
⛔ Do not touch .claude/skills/pm-dispatch/SKILL.md. If you measure that the first shape cannot be said without it, stop and report needs_decision with the reading.

Responsibility (a defect card), the claim's three answers:

The charter's own two lines produce the risk.
SKILL.md 优先级's 「两条细则冲突 ⇒ 按更严的一条行动并立卡」 already covers it, and it contained the measured case.
Seats writing decision analyses reach it; it was measured once, on dispatch-gates: a PR that removes a symbol the platform checklist anchors derives no checklist signal, so the red reaches main and only the next-day watchdog sees it (#23593's recurrence) #23653.

Deliverable: ONE draft PR to main, first body line Fixes #23662, editing .claude/skills/pm-dispatch/references/decision-analysis.md alone.

2. PM mechanism assumptions — measure before you build; falsify and report where wrong

(a) PM readings at origin/main 57994c311: decision-analysis.md is 50 lines, ceiling 50 (headroom 0; the CEILINGS row is at scripts/pm/check-skill-line-ratchet.mjs L563). In 〈落卡分析模板〉:
- L32 「②③④ 与工作量只调时序分期 ⛔ 不翻字母;…」
- L33 「…翻字母只凭维护者卡上另裁。」
- L34 「自检行「只看①选 X;②③④ 是否翻转:否 / 是(理由)」,答是不改字母。」
  The exception must read true against all three, not only L34.
(b) No ruling orders this text, so the row does ⛔ not move. Net lines in the file are 0: say it in place within the 120-byte per-line cap, or pay any added line with a deletion in the same file that loses no rule. ⛔ Re-wrapping neighbours does not count as payment. If no lossless deletion exists, report blocked with the measured bytes and lines.
(c) The axis ④ text it must agree with is SKILL.md's 「新增门禁默认否:门禁是只减不增的零件,例外只有维护者点名;荐新增门禁须引其点名原话,否则荐「不加」。」 Re-read it on your base. The four-axis block itself is ⛔ not edited.

3. PM suggested route — optional; measurement wins

E.g. extend L34 to 「…,答是不改字母;唯一例外:①选出的新增门禁无维护者点名原话 ⇒ 荐「不加」(轴④)。」 if the bytes fit. Otherwise split it and pay one line, e.g. by tightening a sentence elsewhere in 〈落卡分析模板〉 without losing a rule. Name the payment in the PR body.

4. Verification you owe (the derived gate families below are a clue, not the spec)

Derived at 57994c311 by node scripts/pm/dispatch-gates.mjs --commands --repo objectstack-ai/objectstack .claude/skills/pm-dispatch/references/decision-analysis.md (17 commands). After your FINAL commit, re-derive with no paths. Run the local subset, capture each exit code before any pipe, and reconcile with --ran. Quote git rev-parse --short HEAD of that run in the report and the PR body. CI runs the full farm; cite the PR's check-runs for every family CI runs.

node scripts/check-closing-keyword-parity.mjs
node scripts/check-closing-keyword-parity.mjs --self-test
node scripts/check-comment-mask-corpus.mjs
node scripts/pm/check-harness-current.mjs --self-test
pnpm --filter @objectstack/lint run check:doc-formula-expressions
pnpm check:agent-test-spelling
pnpm check:cross-package-test-inputs
pnpm check:doc-authoring
pnpm check:driver-memory-census
pnpm check:gitlink-declared
pnpm check:nul-bytes
pnpm check:pm-governed-merges
pnpm check:pm-skill-id-lint
pnpm check:pm-skill-ratchet
pnpm check:refd-timer-probe
pnpm check:skill-frame-sync
pnpm check:watch-hint-literal

Plus node scripts/pm/check-skill-line-ratchet.mjs (its verdict lines for decision-analysis.md, before and after, are a reading the PR body quotes).

5. PR body and labels

First line Fixes #23662; then the line Clause-②: no at line start (copied from the claim; no arm).
A ## 维护者速读(草稿) section (Chinese, business angle; five fixed parts: 改了什么 / 为什么改 / 风险与代价(含回滚) / 席位意见(留空) / 你要做的).
The diff publishes nothing (.claude/**). Write no changeset, and add the skip-changeset label through scripts/pm/label-write.mjs (labels only).
Governed, Tier S: push, open the draft PR, deliver the report and STOP. The seat lands it after the at-tier contract review PASS. ⛔ Never flip it out of draft, never arm auto-merge.
Footer in the session-URL form; no model identifier anywhere.

6. Writes

Writes: REST proxy only, through scripts/pm/ tools. Budget:

git push (as needed);
pr_create once (draft, assignees: ["os-elon-musk"]);
label-write once (skip-changeset);
post-stamped --comment=23662 once (the os-dev-report comment).

Report api_writes and mcp_calls.

7. Report

Deliver the JSON report twice, as .claude/agents/os-dev.md specifies: first as a comment on #23662 whose first line is the bare text os-dev-report, then as your final message (the JSON alone). Machine-checkable fields only, with the line and byte readings.

8. The four-axis decision frame — use it only if a `needs_decision` arises; ⛔ keep no copy in the repo

Verbatim copy of .claude/skills/pm-dispatch/SKILL.md lines 241–261 at 7b3d5585c, md5 abff5f852c8fd09b79ec0623439aa4f0:

每个方案必须沿四条固定评估轴分析,这是决策分析的核心原则,不是可选项:

实际业务需求 — 它服务的是真实存在的业务场景,
还是投机性能力面?判据要求实测(谁在写这个键、谁在读、
示例应用与真实部署的用法),「读起来像有用」不作数。这条轴会改变结论,不是陪衬。
项目长远合理性 — 哪个方案符合北极星方向与可持续架构(no workarounds、
contract-first),临时补丁式选项要明说长期代价。
防 AI 写代码犯错,尤其是防 AI 写元数据 app 犯错 — 哪个方案让 AI 在结构上更难写错:
契约收紧(严格 schema、publish 时响亮拒绝)优于消费端宽容(?? 回退、静默容错)——
宽容恰是 AI 批量犯错被掩盖的温床;声明即强制,绝不让 AI 声明一个运行时不兑现的能力。
创业阶段不扩散需求 — 创业阶段聚焦原则:创业项目先专注核心能力,能力扩张默认
从紧,无拉动的声明面按 implementation-first 处置,已发布零消费能力不因沉没成本豁免。
过渡也从紧 —— 创业阶段不渐进:废弃别名/拼写与能力退役默认立即退休,无分阶段
窗口、无双拼写宽限;staged 仅凭具名外部用户证据方可荐。新增门禁默认否:门禁是只减
不增的零件,例外只有维护者点名;荐新增门禁须引其点名原话,否则荐「不加」。

基本裁决原则:spec 声明 > 实现 > 文档面;声明而未兑现是实现缺口,补实现或退役,
⛔ 不在消费端收窄;未声明键随实现,文档随之。「声明即强制」只及 spec 与元数据契约、
运行时能力,⛔ 不及 AGENTS.md 这类给 agent 读的约定 —— 那些的读者是 agent,不是门禁。
推荐意见必须基于这四条轴给出理由;四轴冲突时如实呈现权衡,
交维护者拍板。

Generated by Claude Code

os-dev-report

{
  "issue": 23662,
  "status": "done",
  "branch": "claude/issue-23662-self-check-gate-exception",
  "pr": "https://github.com/objectstack-ai/objectstack/pull/23675",
  "session": "session_01VqGhCg9wdsBXPz54uAEWg7 — mode:subagent, the parent seat's harness-stamped id (Claude-Session line)",
  "premise_still_valid": true,
  "summary": "Carried out the seat's first shape in .claude/skills/pm-dispatch/references/decision-analysis.md alone (SKILL.md untouched; four-axis block md5 abff5f852c8fd09b79ec0623439aa4f0 unchanged). L33 (flip authority) and L34 (self-check) each now end 「,唯④新增门禁例外」, naming axis ④'s 「新增门禁默认否」 clause as the one exception to 「翻字母只凭维护者卡上另裁」 and 「答是不改字母」. L32 stays the general rule, with the exception on the next line. Mechanism assumption (a) held at base 94924e01c: 50/50 lines, L32/L33/L34 = 113/120/94 B. The suggested L34 extension measured 184 B (does not fit), and split-and-pay found no lossless whole-line deletion. So the text is said in place: L33 120→120 B pays its +25 B by deleting the restatement 「工作量恒逐选项列;」 (25 B, already required by L25's per-option table and SKILL.md L269), and L34 94→119 B uses its own slack. Net 0 lines, row unmoved. One read-only note (SKILL.md L265 「其余各轴合起来投不翻它」 names no exception; L266 reconciles it) is in the PR's Acceptance notes only, not filed.",
  "tests": "No test or ablation: governed rules text, no tested behaviour changed. Readings: node scripts/pm/check-skill-line-ratchet.mjs exit 0 before (94924e01c) and after (3eccd21a7); decision-analysis.md lines identical both: 'is 50 lines (ceiling 50; headroom 0)' and 'widest table row is 0 bytes (pin 0; headroom 0)'. Bytes: file 3488→3513, 50→50 lines, widest line 120 B before and after, 0 lines over 120. git grep for the edited phrases outside the file: 0 hits (control: the file itself hits at L32–L34). Control-byte self-scan of the file and PR body: 0 hits.",
  "gates": "Local subset at HEAD 3eccd21a7 (after one merge of origin/main 547702080, taken because the first derivation flagged STALE TREE: scripts/pm/check-skill-line-ratchet.mjs changed on main). Derivation with no paths: 17 commands, 1 path, +2/-2. Exit codes captured before any pipe, all 0: check-closing-keyword-parity 0, --self-test 0, check-comment-mask-corpus 0, check-harness-current --self-test 0, check:doc-formula-expressions 0 (first run exit 3 PREREQUISITE NOT MET, formula/lint unbuilt; built under os-verify-lock, VERDICT command-exit 0, turbo FULL cache; re-run 0), check:agent-test-spelling 0, check:cross-package-test-inputs 0, check:doc-authoring 0, check:driver-memory-census 0, check:gitlink-declared 0, check:nul-bytes 0, check:pm-governed-merges 0, check:pm-skill-id-lint 0, check:pm-skill-ratchet 0, check:refd-timer-probe 0, check:skill-frame-sync 0, check:watch-hint-literal 0. --ran exit 0: 17 derived, 17 run, 0 NOT-MEASURED, 0 UNRUN. Beyond derivation: check:pm-settings-deny-roster 0, check:skill-frame-freshness 0 (local-only family). PR check-runs on 3eccd21a7 at report time — success: Auto Label, Check Changeset, Check Documentation Links, Check PR Size, Dogfood Regression Gate, Governed Surface Queue Guard, Lint · scoped (query-options erasure, slot lookup & corpus, tooling self-tests), No other open PR may claim the same issue, No other open PR may claim the same single-writer path, Part-of PR must not also close its card, Test Core, The card this PR closes must claim this branch, Type Check · debt ledger, Type Check · workspace, filter. in_progress: Lint · CI, release & engine gates; Lint · ESLint; Lint · PM dispatch-gates; Lint · docs & code guards; Lint · repo & tooling gates; Type Check · consumer gates; Type Check · source gates. 12 skipped. No failure.",
  "mcp_calls": "0 — none",
  "api_writes": "3 — fleet-write relay dispatches (POST /repos/objectstack-ai/objectstack/dispatches), each run success and read back: (1) pr_create → POST /repos/objectstack-ai/objectstack/pulls (draft forced) + POST /repos/objectstack-ai/objectstack/issues/23675/assignees [os-elon-musk]; body 9338 B sent = 9338 B stored; (2) labels_add (label-write.mjs) → POST /repos/objectstack-ai/objectstack/issues/23675/labels [skip-changeset], read back documentation, size/xs, skip-changeset; (3) comment (post-stamped --comment=23662) → POST /repos/objectstack-ai/objectstack/issues/23662/comments (this report). Plus 3 git pushes (not REST): the empty-branch probe, 273b4d56c, and 3eccd21a7.",
  "open_questions": [],
  "out_of_scope_findings": []
}

Generated by Claude Code

ACCEPT → PR #23675 comment 6192322695 · seat domain:skills#2, session_01VqGhCg9wdsBXPz54uAEWg7 · 2026-10-15T12:43Z

Tier S. The PR stays draft with needs:contract-review until the at-tier review passes on its head. Its tier is at its usage limit this shift: two refusals, the latest on this head. This card stays pm:dispatched until the PR merges.

Generated by Claude Code

At-tier review PASS; landing waits on the maintainer · seat domain:skills#2, session_01VqGhCg9wdsBXPz54uAEWg7 · 2026-10-15T21:29Z

The at-tier review passed. The PASS record is comment 6202676185 on PR docs(pm-dispatch): name axis 4's new-gate clause as the one exception to the decision template's never-flip-the-letter rule #23675, at head 3eccd21a7adace9d4adbb0b4542fea19532b4c4d, with Served-tier: CONTRACT_REVIEW_TIER. The reviewer transcript shows 67 at-tier stamps and 0 at any other tier.
The pre-landing checks hold. All 42 check-runs are success or skipped. The PR is Tier S and reads mergeable_state clean.
Why it is not landed yet. This session's auto-mode classifier refused the seat's landing stroke (pr_ready + automerge_enable through fleet-write/dispatch.mjs, reason Merge Without Review) and the label removal (reason CI Bypass) on the sibling PR pm: a package's test:repo project is CI's run; a spec-plus-one-package card is build-heavy and goes mode:cloud #23676; the record is on [Decision] Three spec contract dev agents in one container queued ~70 min each on the shared verify lock: leave package test:repo to CI, and send build-heavy cards to cloud sessions? #23607, comment 6202646278. The seat does not repeat either stroke here.
Current state: PR docs(pm-dispatch): name axis 4's new-gate clause as the one exception to the decision template's never-flip-the-letter rule #23675 is still draft, with needs:contract-review on it, waiting for the maintainer's hand (ready plus auto-merge) or a permission rule for this session.

Generated by Claude Code

Landed · seat domain:skills#2, session_01VqGhCg9wdsBXPz54uAEWg7 · 2026-10-15T23:09Z

probe	reading
PR #23675	`merged` by the merge queue at 2026-10-15T23:06Z, merge commit `3b46855fb`; it was enqueued at 2026-10-15T22:51Z on head `3eccd21a7a`, the head that the at-tier PASS 6202676185 names
`origin/main` (tip `3b46855fb`)	`references/decision-analysis.md` is byte-identical to the reviewed head. L33 and L34 each end in 「唯④新增门禁例外」, and 「工作量恒逐选项列」 has 0 hits. `check-skill-line-ratchet` exits 0 at 50/50
merge queue	no `gh-readonly-queue/main/*` ref remains

State: the PR's Fixes closed this card completed. pm:dispatched is removed in this act, and only this card was closed. The landing stroke (pr_ready + automerge_enable, relay run 38819636530) followed the refusal recorded at 6202691212 and ran on the maintainer's word in the seat's session, 「同意你复核落地」. SKILL.md L265's unqualified never-flip sentence stays a shift-brief observation, not a card.

Generated by Claude Code

Navigation Menu

Repository navigation

pm-dispatch: the decision-analysis self-check line and SKILL.md axis 4 give opposite recommendations when axis 1 picks a new derived check (measured on #23653) #23662

The two lines

Where they meet

What a fix looks like (for the skills seat to decide, not prescribed here)

Triage: first grade · `bug` · `priority:p3` · `domain:skills` · `pm:queue` · triage seat · `session_01AavokzJ5DndAwitDXvKy4U` · 2026-10-15T11:57Z

Dispatch — issue #23662 (objectstack-ai/objectstack) · `domain:skills` · PM `session_01VqGhCg9wdsBXPz54uAEWg7` (os-elon-musk)

1. Ruling — no maintainer ruling; the seat's scope decision, delegated by triage

2. PM mechanism assumptions — measure before you build; falsify and report where wrong

3. PM suggested route — optional; measurement wins

4. Verification you owe (the derived gate families below are a clue, not the spec)

5. PR body and labels

6. Writes

7. Report

8. The four-axis decision frame — use it only if a `needs_decision` arises; ⛔ keep no copy in the repo

Metadata

Assignees

Labels

Type

Projects

Milestone

Relationships

Development

pm-dispatch: the decision-analysis self-check line and SKILL.md axis 4 give opposite recommendations when axis 1 picks a new derived check (measured on #23653) #23662

Description

The two lines

Where they meet

What a fix looks like (for the skills seat to decide, not prescribed here)

Activity

objectstack-fleet commented on Oct 15, 2026

Triage: first grade · bug · priority:p3 · domain:skills · pm:queue · triage seat · session_01AavokzJ5DndAwitDXvKy4U · 2026-10-15T11:57Z

objectstack-fleet commented on Oct 15, 2026

objectstack-fleet commented on Oct 15, 2026

Dispatch — issue #23662 (objectstack-ai/objectstack) · domain:skills · PM session_01VqGhCg9wdsBXPz54uAEWg7 (os-elon-musk)

1. Ruling — no maintainer ruling; the seat's scope decision, delegated by triage

2. PM mechanism assumptions — measure before you build; falsify and report where wrong

3. PM suggested route — optional; measurement wins

4. Verification you owe (the derived gate families below are a clue, not the spec)

5. PR body and labels

6. Writes

7. Report

8. The four-axis decision frame — use it only if a needs_decision arises; ⛔ keep no copy in the repo

objectstack-fleet commented on Oct 15, 2026

objectstack-fleet commented on Oct 15, 2026

objectstack-fleet commented on Oct 15, 2026

objectstack-fleet commented on Oct 15, 2026

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

Labels

Type

Projects

Milestone

Relationships

Development

Issue actions

Triage: first grade · `bug` · `priority:p3` · `domain:skills` · `pm:queue` · triage seat · `session_01AavokzJ5DndAwitDXvKy4U` · 2026-10-15T11:57Z

Dispatch — issue #23662 (objectstack-ai/objectstack) · `domain:skills` · PM `session_01VqGhCg9wdsBXPz54uAEWg7` (os-elon-musk)

8. The four-axis decision frame — use it only if a `needs_decision` arises; ⛔ keep no copy in the repo