Repository navigation
docs: record accepted P0 negotiated NameList pipeline and physical acceptance gates - #198
Conversation
…ld acceptance gates
Codex Review SummaryThis comment shows the latest Codex review activity on this pull request.
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHubYour team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
Codex reacts with 👀 while any review is running, comments if it has suggestions, and reacts with 👍 once all reviews finish with no findings. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codex Review
Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.
Reviewed commit: cdb2082db2
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub
Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
- Open a pull request for review
- Mark a draft as ready
- Comment "@codex review".
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.
Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".
|
|
||
| ## P0 negotiated NameList wire pipeline — 2026-10-16 (WIB) | ||
|
|
||
| - **Actual main at integration:** `47f9966edc07d5ef391d149b0ac60bc259b5bd11` after [PR #197](https://github.com/masarray/arstack61850/pull/197), source head `88ba0419af3866938be7a69c57cdc6cea6c56457`. **13/13 exact-head workflows SUCCESS** including C++ GCC/Clang/MSVC, native IED Simulator Qt, Security and Evidence, SCL-assisted, MMS/RCB, interoperability, and Product Naming Guard. Automated review issue about strict GCC aggregate initialization was corrected and marked resolved. Post-merge `main` workflows were still active at the checkpoint; independently verify results on their actual SHA. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Retire the superseded “latest” checkpoint
When an engineer uses this handoff to resume work, the new integration record conflicts with the still-active section immediately below: line 9 identifies 47f9966e as the integrated main, while lines 18–24 still call aae37327 the “Latest accepted P0 checkpoint” and instruct readers to implement the negotiated pipeline that the new section says is already merged. Mark that older section as historical/superseded so the handoff does not direct follow-up work from stale state.
Useful? React with 👍 / 👎.
Documentation-only cross-thread Workbench handoff update after merged PR #197 at main
47f9966edc07d5ef391d149b0ac60bc259b5bd11. Record 13/13 exact-head CI green, one association-owned bounded batch dispatcher, strict negotiated-window safety, read-only CLI opt-in, out-of-order/InformationReport/partial-failure regression, truthful unverified physical IED and Windows installer status, and independent observed Chocolatey NSIS HTTP 503 packaging incident. No protocol, GUI, firmware, installer, workflows, or other product source modified.