Skip to content

docs: record accepted P0 negotiated NameList pipeline and physical acceptance gates - #198

Merged
masarray merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
docs/workbench-negotiated-pipeline-handoff-20261016
Oct 16, 2026
Merged

masarray merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
docs/workbench-negotiated-pipeline-handoff-20261016

Conversation

@masarray

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

Documentation-only cross-thread Workbench handoff update after merged PR #197 at main 47f9966edc07d5ef391d149b0ac60bc259b5bd11. Record 13/13 exact-head CI green, one association-owned bounded batch dispatcher, strict negotiated-window safety, read-only CLI opt-in, out-of-order/InformationReport/partial-failure regression, truthful unverified physical IED and Windows installer status, and independent observed Chocolatey NSIS HTTP 503 packaging incident. No protocol, GUI, firmware, installer, workflows, or other product source modified.

@chatgpt-codex-connector

chatgpt-codex-connector Bot commented Oct 16, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codex Review Summary

This comment shows the latest Codex review activity on this pull request.

Review Status Commit Review trigger
📝 Code Review ✅ Completed 2026-10-16T11:15:05.867537Z cdb2082 PR opened
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review" or "@codex security review".

Codex reacts with 👀 while any review is running, comments if it has suggestions, and reacts with 👍 once all reviews finish with no findings.

@masarray
masarray merged commit 3aec5ee into main Oct 16, 2026
1 check passed

@chatgpt-codex-connector chatgpt-codex-connector Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codex Review

Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.

Reviewed commit: cdb2082db2

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".


## P0 negotiated NameList wire pipeline — 2026-10-16 (WIB)

- **Actual main at integration:** `47f9966edc07d5ef391d149b0ac60bc259b5bd11` after [PR #197](https://github.com/masarray/arstack61850/pull/197), source head `88ba0419af3866938be7a69c57cdc6cea6c56457`. **13/13 exact-head workflows SUCCESS** including C++ GCC/Clang/MSVC, native IED Simulator Qt, Security and Evidence, SCL-assisted, MMS/RCB, interoperability, and Product Naming Guard. Automated review issue about strict GCC aggregate initialization was corrected and marked resolved. Post-merge `main` workflows were still active at the checkpoint; independently verify results on their actual SHA.

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

P2 Badge Retire the superseded “latest” checkpoint

When an engineer uses this handoff to resume work, the new integration record conflicts with the still-active section immediately below: line 9 identifies 47f9966e as the integrated main, while lines 18–24 still call aae37327 the “Latest accepted P0 checkpoint” and instruct readers to implement the negotiated pipeline that the new section says is already merged. Mark that older section as historical/superseded so the handoff does not direct follow-up work from stale state.

Useful? React with 👍 / 👎.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant