Skip to content

chore(AIC-3500): regenerate the evaluations API report after #202 - #205

Merged
jeffdupont merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
jdupont/aic-3500-api-report-after-202
Oct 23, 2026
Merged

jeffdupont merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
jdupont/aic-3500-api-report-after-202

Conversation

@jeffdupont

@jeffdupont jeffdupont commented Oct 23, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Main's Tests job has failed since #202 merged (run 39959179499): tests/test_api_report.py::test_committed_reports_are_current reports that launchdarkly_ai_server.experimental.evaluations.txt is out of date.

#202 removed EvaluationsModule.api. Its last commit was pushed before the API report check (#195, #196) merged, so its own CI never ran the check. This PR is the output of make api-report: one line removed (api: LDApiClient [property]).

Checked locally: make api-report-check reports "15 API reports are current", and tests/test_api_report.py passes.

🤖 Generated with Claude Code


Note

Overview
Regenerates the committed evaluations API report so it matches the current experimental public surface after EvaluationsModule.api was removed in #202.

The only report change is dropping the api: LDApiClient property line from EvaluationsModule; this unblocks test_committed_reports_are_current / make api-report-check.

Reviewed by Cursor Bugbot for commit 728bc50. Bugbot is set up for automated code reviews on this repo. Configure here.

#202 removed EvaluationsModule.api, but it branched before the API report
check (#195, #196) merged, so its CI never ran the check and main's Tests
job has failed since it merged. This is the output of `make api-report`:
one line removed.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
@jeffdupont
jeffdupont requested a review from a team as a code owner October 23, 2026 14:30
@jeffdupont
jeffdupont merged commit 99b57dc into main Oct 23, 2026
11 checks passed
@jeffdupont
jeffdupont deleted the jdupont/aic-3500-api-report-after-202 branch October 23, 2026 14:44
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants