Repository navigation
Remove note about requesting access to draft pull requests - #46522
Conversation
Removed the outdated note about requesting access to draft pull requests for organization members.
How to review these changes 👓Thank you for your contribution. To review these changes, choose one of the following options: A Hubber will need to deploy your changes internally to review. Table of review linksNote: Please update the URL for your staging server or codespace. The table shows the files in the
Key: fpt: Free, Pro, Team; ghec: GitHub Enterprise Cloud; ghes: GitHub Enterprise Server 🤖 This comment is automatically generated. |
|
Thanks, @WouterVanGoey; we'll get this reviewed by the appropriate team |
|
@WouterVanGoey 👋🏻 - Thanks for catching this and for the clean one-line fix 🙏 I'll approve and merge this ⚡ |
mchammer01
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Thanks for spotting this inaccuracy and for fixing it ✨
|
Thanks very much for contributing! Your pull request has been merged 🎉 You should see your changes appear on the site in approximately 24 hours. If you're looking for your next contribution, check out our help wanted issues ⚡ |
Why:
No issue opened; this is a one-sentence removal.
Since 2025-05-01, draft pull requests are available in all repositories, public or private, on every plan (changelog). The reusable for creating a pull request still tells organization members they "may need to request access to draft pull requests from an organization owner". The section it links to no longer mentions any access requirement. As far as I can tell, no organization setting controls draft pull requests, so the sentence appears to date from when drafts were plan-gated.
What's being changed (if available, include any code snippets, screenshots, or gifs):
Removes one sentence from
data/reusables/repositories/create-pull-request.md. The reusable appears on five pages, including "Creating a pull request" and "Creating a pull request from a fork". The link to the "Draft pull requests" section stays.If an organization-level control over draft pull requests does exist, I'm happy to reword the sentence to name it instead.
Check off the following: