You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I was re-reading your issue. Your trying to create a user with a roll directly defined in user object, right? You can't do this for now. It should behave as you're showing (it should ignore the rols key).
Well, I understand that the related objects have to be saved with setRols (in this case), but the problem is with the insert statement generated. It contains this field "rols" that is un the object, but not in the definition...
Activity
dresende commentedon May 29, 2013
It doesn't seem so. I have to test and see what's going wrong.
dresende commentedon May 29, 2013
I was re-reading your issue. Your trying to create a user with a roll directly defined in user object, right? You can't do this for now. It should behave as you're showing (it should ignore the
rolskey).dresende commentedon May 29, 2013
I think that what you want is what is described in #162, right?
maxsosa commentedon May 29, 2013
Well, I understand that the related objects have to be saved with setRols (in this case), but the problem is with the insert statement generated. It contains this field "rols" that is un the object, but not in the definition...
dresende commentedon May 29, 2013
Yes, that's the only thing I want to check and fix. The other thing I suppose it's the same as the other issue.