Repository navigation
"RuntimeError: Racing with another loop to spawn a process" when spawning many processes from multiple threads #508
Copy link
Copy link
Open
Description
- uvloop version:
0.17.0 - Python version:
3.10.8 - Platform: Arch Linux
- Can you reproduce the bug with
PYTHONASYNCIODEBUGin env?: Yes - Does uvloop behave differently from vanilla asyncio? How?: Yes, there is no exception.
We have a multi-threaded application using uvloop that sometimes needs to spawn a lot of processes simultaneously.
This results in a lot of "RuntimeError: Racing with another loop to spawn a process" exceptions being raised.
The following is a minimal reproducible example that shows the problem:
import asyncio
from threading import Thread
import uvloop
def create_processes(i):
async def inner():
processes = []
for _ in range(100):
p = await asyncio.create_subprocess_exec("true")
processes.append(p)
for p in processes:
await p.wait()
try:
asyncio.run(inner())
print(f"[{i}] Success.")
except Exception as e:
print(f"[{i}] Fail: {repr(e)}")
def main():
threads = []
for i in range(10):
t = Thread(target=lambda: create_processes(i))
t.start()
threads.append(t)
for t in threads:
t.join()
uvloop.install()
main()When running this with PYTHONASYNCIODEBUG=1 I get something like:
Executing <Task pending name='Task-3' coro=<create_processes.<locals>.inner() running at /home/tyilo/repos/uvloop-race/test.py:11> wait_for=<Future pending cb=[Task.task_wakeup()] created at /usr/lib/python3.10/asyncio/subprocess.py:218> cb=[run_until_complete.<locals>.done_cb()] created at /usr/lib/python3.10/asyncio/tasks.py:636> took 0.132 seconds
Executing <Handle UVProcessTransport._call_connection_made created at /usr/lib/python3.10/asyncio/subprocess.py:218> took 0.133 seconds
Executing <Task pending name='Task-4' coro=<create_processes.<locals>.inner() running at /home/tyilo/repos/uvloop-race/test.py:11> wait_for=<Future pending cb=[Task.task_wakeup()] created at /usr/lib/python3.10/asyncio/subprocess.py:218> cb=[run_until_complete.<locals>.done_cb()] created at /usr/lib/python3.10/asyncio/tasks.py:636> took 0.142 seconds
Executing <Task pending name='Task-6' coro=<create_processes.<locals>.inner() running at /home/tyilo/repos/uvloop-race/test.py:11> wait_for=<Future pending cb=[Task.task_wakeup()] created at /usr/lib/python3.10/asyncio/subprocess.py:218> cb=[run_until_complete.<locals>.done_cb()] created at /usr/lib/python3.10/asyncio/tasks.py:636> took 0.147 seconds
[0] Fail: RuntimeError('Racing with another loop to spawn a process.')
Executing <Task pending name='Task-9' coro=<create_processes.<locals>.inner() running at /home/tyilo/repos/uvloop-race/test.py:11> wait_for=<Future pending cb=[Task.task_wakeup()] created at /usr/lib/python3.10/asyncio/subprocess.py:218> cb=[run_until_complete.<locals>.done_cb()] created at /usr/lib/python3.10/asyncio/tasks.py:636> took 0.157 seconds
Executing <Task pending name='Task-8' coro=<create_processes.<locals>.inner() running at /home/tyilo/repos/uvloop-race/test.py:11> wait_for=<Future pending cb=[Task.task_wakeup()] created at /usr/lib/python3.10/asyncio/subprocess.py:218> cb=[run_until_complete.<locals>.done_cb()] created at /usr/lib/python3.10/asyncio/tasks.py:636> took 0.175 seconds
Executing <Task pending name='Task-7' coro=<create_processes.<locals>.inner() running at /home/tyilo/repos/uvloop-race/test.py:11> wait_for=<Future pending cb=[Task.task_wakeup()] created at /usr/lib/python3.10/asyncio/subprocess.py:218> cb=[run_until_complete.<locals>.done_cb()] created at /usr/lib/python3.10/asyncio/tasks.py:636> took 0.176 seconds
[2] Fail: RuntimeError('Racing with another loop to spawn a process.')
[9] Fail: RuntimeError('Racing with another loop to spawn a process.')
[1] Fail: RuntimeError('Racing with another loop to spawn a process.')
[4] Fail: RuntimeError('Racing with another loop to spawn a process.')
[3] Success.
[6] Success.
[8] Success.
[5] Success.
[7] Success.
Without uvloop I get something like:
[3] Success.
[9] Success.
[5] Success.
[7] Success.
[2] Success.
[4] Success.
[8] Success.
[0] Success.
[6] Success.
[1] Success.
Reacted by Guillaume Pouyat and handsomeli177
Metadata
Metadata
Assignees
Labels
No labels
Activity
ljluestc commentedon Jan 16, 2024
alexon1234 commentedon Dec 10, 2025
Hit the same issue
Serialize process spawning across threads with a lock