Skip to content

Compact maintenance docs and run CI only for changed risks - #302

Merged
HTExplicit merged 2 commits into
mainfrom
chore/compact-docs-selective-ci
Oct 30, 2026
Merged

HTExplicit merged 2 commits into
mainfrom
chore/compact-docs-selective-ci

Conversation

@HTExplicit

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

Changes

Maintenance documentation repeated current behavior and retained obsolete recovery and testing instructions. Compact the downstream contracts and historical reviews, add a repository-local AGENTS entry, and make the developer guide select checks for the actual change.

Replace unconditional historical CI suites with one changed-risk plan and shared execution action. Keep all ten protected check names and the existing branch protection. Unknown executable inputs fail classification; required jobs report applicable execution, verified reuse, or explicit non-applicability. Receipt reuse verifies the complete tested tree, concrete targets, workflow definitions, environment and original successful execution. Preserve upstream dispatch, the macOS shell runner, scheduled security scans, and runtime checks when their actual inputs change. Release and production workflows are unchanged.

Validation

  • Changed-document static checks and affected local anchors passed.
  • Offline classification (22), receipt (17), runner (9), workflow (4), and the modified existing workflow contract (1) passed; fixes were rechecked only for their direct impact.
  • Changed YAML parsing, Python syntax and diff formatting passed.
  • No business, database, race, stress or real-model tests were run locally. This PR's selected CI work is static documentation and offline CI/upstream workflow contracts.

@HTExplicit
HTExplicit enabled auto-merge October 30, 2026 18:53
@HTExplicit
HTExplicit merged commit ee630ff into main Oct 30, 2026
12 checks passed
@HTExplicit
HTExplicit deleted the chore/compact-docs-selective-ci branch October 30, 2026 19:03
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant