Skip to content

merge queue: checking #1378 + #1381 + #1387 + #1388 together on main (ff82cf8) - #1395

Closed
mergify[bot] wants to merge 10 commits into
mainfrom
mergify/merge-queue/6f8c9c3063
Closed

mergify[bot] wants to merge 10 commits into
mainfrom
mergify/merge-queue/6f8c9c3063

Conversation

@mergify

@mergify mergify Bot commented Oct 13, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

✨ Pull request #1388 has been merged manually at 12ae673. The pull requests [#1378 + #1381 + #1387] have been requeued. ✨

#1378 + #1381 + #1387 + #1388 are queued together for merge on branch main (ff82cf8).

This pull request has been created by Mergify to check the mergeability of [#1378 + #1381 + #1387 + #1388].
You don't need to do anything. Mergify will close this pull request automatically when it is complete.

Required conditions of queue rule admin-bypass for merge:

  • check-success = test
  • check-success = validate
  • check-success = lint

Required conditions to stay in the queue:

---
all_scopes: false
checking_base_sha: ff82cf89b9897a903904fa303403ba1e0f4e1ad6
previous_check_retries: []
previous_failed_batches: []
pull_requests:
  - number: 1378
    scopes: []
  - number: 1381
    scopes: []
  - number: 1387
    scopes: []
  - number: 1388
    scopes: []
scopes: []
...

EdbertChan and others added 10 commits October 12, 2026 21:37
The ledger now refuses a reply that tags a claim and offers 'say ...' or
'tell me to test it' for a read-only check. The frustration watchdog accepts
'I am running X now' as a valid next step.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Change-Id: I3b5ef1297fe1f20eec746fd4f74ccc44c54516ca
…ho made their thing

Asked which merge request produced a page the user owns, the assistant ran keyword
searches, hit timeouts and unrelated results, and reported none found. Listing the
user's own merge requests found it at once. One working-style rule line.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Change-Id: Icf84fb21574c8af5632bafe3e0b894131970e558
The pre-push review-unit check used a bash 4 builtin that the default macOS
shell (3.2) does not have, so every push from a Mac stopped at the hook. Read
the NUL-separated file lists with a portable loop instead.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>

Change-Id: I186973c821653410e5d48a13d1acd2f2e4bb8433
Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Change-Id: I26c788b179793511a9191bede9861bd8521bc347
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant