Repository navigation
Test iterable edge inputs in solid fillet and chamfer - #2107
RanaPriyansh wants to merge 2 commits into
Conversation
|
Merged current master and completed fresh sequential Linux validation. The macOS baseline still has the recorded Codex used. |
Codecov Report✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests. Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #2107 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 95.81% 95.81%
=======================================
Files 30 30
Lines 9599 9599
Branches 1441 1441
=======================================
Hits 9197 9197
Misses 247 247
Partials 155 155 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Harness. 🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
|
|
Marked ready for review after upstream cross-platform validation. Older Azure check record Codex used. |
The direct solid methods need iterable-input coverage alongside the Shape-input cases in #2105.
Add six cases for lists and one-use generators in fillet and chamfer, including asymmetric chamfer.
Check valid output geometry, face counts, analytical volumes, and valid, unit-volume input solids.
These tests support #2104.
Sequential Linux validation uses Ubuntu 24.04, Python 3.12.15, and OCP 8.0.1.1:
The upstream AppVeyor matrix passes Black, Mypy, and the complete suite:
The Azure Windows 3.13 build also passes.
Both providers tested the PR merge commit, whose tree equals the published candidate tree.
An older Azure check record for that successful build remains queued.
The local macOS baseline volume failure in
test_interpPlateremains recorded.Codex used.