Skip to content

Update user-facing LJPW terminology to developer-friendly names - #80

Merged
BruinGrowly merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
claude/review-new-docs-01UDv9fzrkTojttRYasTCPdM
Dec 10, 2025
Merged

BruinGrowly merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
claude/review-new-docs-01UDv9fzrkTojttRYasTCPdM

Conversation

@BruinGrowly

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

Internal LJPW constants remain unchanged, but user-facing descriptions now use:

  • L → Cohesion (integration, connectivity, module relationships)
  • J → Structure (validation, type safety, contracts, consistency)
  • P → Complexity (execution density, logic, cyclomatic complexity)
  • W → Abstraction (documentation, patterns, architecture, design)

This makes the harmonizer output more intuitive for developers while preserving the mathematical foundation.

Internal LJPW constants remain unchanged, but user-facing descriptions now use:
- L → Cohesion (integration, connectivity, module relationships)
- J → Structure (validation, type safety, contracts, consistency)
- P → Complexity (execution density, logic, cyclomatic complexity)
- W → Abstraction (documentation, patterns, architecture, design)

This makes the harmonizer output more intuitive for developers while
preserving the mathematical foundation.
@BruinGrowly
BruinGrowly merged commit b199568 into main Dec 10, 2025
15 checks passed
@BruinGrowly
BruinGrowly deleted the claude/review-new-docs-01UDv9fzrkTojttRYasTCPdM branch December 10, 2025 22:36
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants