Skip to content

generation: Confirm repeated share copies - #196

Closed
BenWestgate wants to merge 1 commit into
reviewability-v1from
codex/103-repeated-share-copies
Closed

BenWestgate wants to merge 1 commit into
reviewability-v1from
codex/103-repeated-share-copies

Conversation

@BenWestgate

@BenWestgate BenWestgate commented Oct 24, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

Superseded by #197. This branch was based on an older revision and the diff unintentionally removed unrelated Core Lightning changes. #197 applies the same focused copy behavior on the current reviewability-v1 base with three small, independently reviewable commits.

Repeated output indices request physical copies of a confirmed
share, not new independent shares. Emit first occurrences before
copies and still require the threshold number of distinct indices.
Each physical card must be confirmed separately, including after
an incorrect confirmation and during re-sharing.

The code, documentation, and focused tests match the previously
validated local three-commit worktree exactly.

refs #103
@chatgpt-codex-connector

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codex Review Summary

This comment shows the latest Codex review activity on this pull request.

Review Status Commit Review trigger
📝 Code Review ⚠️ Failed 2026-10-24T08:56:37.865380Z
We couldn’t complete this review. Comment @codex review to try again.
979aca0 PR opened
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review" or "@codex security review".

Codex reacts with 👀 while any review is running, comments if it has suggestions, and reacts with 👍 once all reviews finish with no findings.

@chatgpt-codex-connector

Copy link
Copy Markdown

You have reached your Codex usage limits for code reviews. You can see your limits in the Codex usage dashboard.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant