Skip to content

errors: Centralize user-facing messages - #183

Draft
BenWestgate wants to merge 1 commit into
codex/split146-confirmationfrom
codex/split146-messages
Draft

BenWestgate wants to merge 1 commit into
codex/split146-confirmationfrom
codex/split146-messages

Conversation

@BenWestgate

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

Keep user-facing checksum and share-set wording in library exceptions instead of a CLI translation table.

Extracted from #146; based on #182. 41 sharing and checksum tests pass. This overlaps #161's message consolidation; do not merge both unchanged.

The CLI replaced library messages through _FRIENDLY_SET_ERRORS and
rewrote prefilled-prompt failures in _prefixed_input_error. The share-set
and checksum errors now carry that text themselves, so the CLI and GUI
print the same words. Length failures use the library's master-seed
length message.

Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01XGMpowzJwwgyHMEd63ijDe

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner Author

@codex review

@chatgpt-codex-connector

chatgpt-codex-connector Bot commented Oct 24, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codex Review Summary

This comment shows the latest Codex review activity on this pull request.

Review Status Commit Review trigger
📝 Code Review ✅ Completed 2026-10-24T04:39:59.056756Z e1d4fb5 Manual request
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review" or "@codex security review".

Codex reacts with 👀 while any review is running, comments if it has suggestions, and reacts with 👍 once all reviews finish with no findings.

@chatgpt-codex-connector

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codex Review: Didn't find any major issues. 🎉

Reviewed commit: e1d4fb5eed

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

@BenWestgate
BenWestgate added this pull request to stack #205 October 24, 2026 13:43

This branch has not been deployed

No deployments
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant