Repository navigation
Preserve local validation harnesses and historical source experiments - #278
Draft
Alexander-Mitrofanov wants to merge 3 commits into
Draft
Alexander-Mitrofanov wants to merge 3 commits into
Alexander-Mitrofanov wants to merge 3 commits into
Conversation
This branch has not been deployed
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This PR preserves 173 historical validation and experimental source files that remained outside the tracked application worktrees. They are stored under
doc/local-validation-archive/files/with their original relative paths and SHA-256/Git blob hashes. A README describes their scope and provenance, and the source distribution includes a verifiedsources.zipcontaining the same 173 files. This preserves long historical paths under the existing tar format.The code comprises standalone header/installed-library consumers, dependency/configure probes, benchmark and native-output comparison harnesses, plotting/report scripts, instrumentation patches, and alternate source controls used during earlier measurements. Examples include a matrix prototype, dense/hash partition experiments, an uncached kinetic control, and historical compiler-compatibility copies. The copied sources are inactive archival material: they are not application replacements or build/test/CI targets.
Why it was not committed before: these helpers and controls lived in issue-specific validation/profiling directories rather than the tracked source checkouts. Earlier PRs committed the selected production changes, while exploratory variants and local verification tooling stayed outside Git. Not every file has a separate decision record, so this PR does not claim every experiment was an overlooked fix. It commits that material now for Martin's inspection before the local workspace is removed.
The C++23 assessment and deliberately set-aside compiler proposal have a separate PR (#277). The actual six-file ensemble-memory integration port has a separate production PR; this archive excludes that port's files. The misleading deletions in
issue-260-validation/debug-mastercame from a copied.gitpointer against a later index: they are not proposed as production deletions. Its older header is retained only as a historical source snapshot.Byte-identical content already reachable from published Git refs is omitted and recorded in the manifest. Generated builds, dependency downloads, private correspondence, delivery payloads and large raw evidence are outside this source PR; a verified local recovery archive outside the IntaRNA folder preserves remaining workspace material.
Validation: all 89 archived Python/shell files pass syntax checks; every stored file matches its recorded source bytes and hash;
make distsucceeds and every one of the 173 sources extracted from the distributed ZIP matches its recorded SHA-256; staged whitespace checks pass. Old C++ experiments were not rebuilt against current master, and no new scientific or performance claim is made. This is intentionally a draft archival PR so preserving the record is separate from choosing any experiment for production.