Skip to content

[BUG] v7 extractor groups exclusion no longer suppresses product-group artifacts under products #856

Closed

Description

@nithinjamespallicka

Release version

v7.0.2

Describe the bug

After upgrading from v6.0.1.10 to v7.x, excluding groups in the extractor configuration no longer suppresses product-group artifacts.

With v7, the extractor still produces product-group artifacts under product folders even when groups are excluded in the extractor config.

Expected behavior

When groups are excluded from extraction, product-group associations should also be excluded, or there should be a dedicated documented config option to suppress product-group child artifacts.

Actual behavior

With v7, the extractor still produces product-group artifacts under product folders even when groups are excluded in the extractor config.

Reproduction Steps

  1. Use apiops v6.0.1.10 with extractor config excluding groups.
  2. Run extractor against an APIM instance with products assigned to groups.
  3. Observe that product-group artifacts are not extracted.
  4. Upgrade to v7.x.
  5. Use the equivalent v7 extractor config excluding groups.
  6. Run extractor against the same APIM instance.
  7. Observe that product-group artifacts are still extracted under products.

Example Config

v6.0.1.10

groupNames: [ignore]

v7.x

groups: []

Activity

  1. github-actions commented on May 19, 2026

    @github-actions
      Thank you for opening this issue! Please be patient while we will look into it and get back to you as this is an open source project. In the meantime make sure you take a look at the [closed issues](https://github.com/Azure/apiops/issues?q=is%3Aissue+is%3Aclosed) in case your question has already been answered. Don't forget to provide any additional information if needed (e.g. scrubbed logs, detailed feature requests,etc.).
      Whenever it's feasible, please don't hesitate to send a Pull Request (PR) our way. We'd greatly appreciate it, and we'll gladly assess and incorporate your changes.
    
  2. guythetechie commented on May 20, 2026

    @guythetechie
    Contributor

    nithinjamespallicka - thanks for the well-described issue. Investigating.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

      Milestone

      No milestone

      Relationships

      None yet

      Development

      No branches or pull requests

      Issue actions